Study: Fairfield Ranks Among Best For 'Food Security'

  • Comments (7)
This map shows Fairfield County's towns ranked in UConn's study of "food security." Towns in green are in the top quarter, yellow towns have above-average security, orange towns are below average and red towns are in the bottom 25 percent. Photo Credit: University of Connecticut

FAIRFIELD COUNTY, Conn. – Residents in many Fairfield County towns are among the least likely to go hungry in the state, according to a recent study by the University of Connecticut.

The study ranked all of Connecticut’s 169 municipalities based on “food security,” a metric that gauges access to healthy food based on economic factors and availability. A town with higher food security is less likely to have hungry or malnourished families.

“Food security is access by all people at all times to enough nutritious food for an active, healthy life,” the U.S. Department of Agriculture says.

The study’s main measure of food security was its “At-Risk Ranking,” which used economic factors such as poverty rate, unemployment, income, education, age, vehicle ownership, and the presence of children in the household. A family living in a town with a better “At-Risk Ranking” is less likely to go hungry than one in a town with a worse rating.

The eight towns with the lowest risk of food insecurity were all in Fairfield County, according to the study. Weston ranked No. 1, followed by Darien, New Canaan, Wilton, Easton, Westport, Ridgefield and Redding. Greenwich had the highest ranking among Connecticut’s large towns (45,000 or more people), with Fairfield second in the same group.

Most of Fairfield County ranked in the top 25 percent in terms of food security. But three towns ranked in the bottom quarter (Bridgeport, Norwalk and Danbury) and three more had a higher-than-average risk of food insecurity (Stamford, Shelton and Stratford).

“The study authors hope these results will be used to stimulate town-level discussion and considerations, and may even help prioritize further analysis and commitment to strategies that will strengthen community food security,” authors Adam Rabinowitz and Jiff Martin wrote. 

Here’s how towns covered by The Daily Voice ranked:

Darien: No. 2 overall; No. 1 among towns with 15,000-25,000 people
Danbury: No. 132 overall; No. 9 among towns with more than 45,000 people
Easton: No. 5 overall; No. 1 among towns with less than 7,500 people
Fairfield: No. 21 overall; No. 2 among towns with more than 45,000 people
Greenwich: No. 18 overall; No. 1 among towns with more than 45,000 people
New Canaan: No. 3 overall; No. 2 among towns with 15,000-25,000 people
Norwalk: No. 128 overall; No. 8 among towns with more than 45,000 people
Redding: No. 8 overall; No. 2 among towns with 7,500-15,000 people
Ridgefield: No. 7 overall; No. 4 among towns with 15,000-25,000 people
Stamford: No. 124 overall; No. 6 among towns with more than 45,000 people
Weston: No. 1 overall; No. 1 among towns with 7,500-15,000 people
Westport: No. 6 overall; No. 1 among towns with 25,000-45,000 people
Wilton: No. 4 overall; No. 3 among towns with 15,000-25,000 people
See the full study and more rankings here.

  • 7

Comments (7)

Mr. Zippy:

I dont understand why all of you fight over something like this...the fact that we paid to study this is part of the they figured out rich people have a better chance of getting healthy food..what a waste of time and money...

Mary Jane Nelson:

This Steve is really sicko...He actually thinks everyone everywhere is someone named Timmy. Not very unstable is he...HAHA
Also I read the links and Steve is a real sicko


Really Sean, is it always just that simple? You don't think that people with jobs go hungry? Sometimes their salaries are enough to pay the bills and that's it. Too many families WITH JOBS have to choose between rent and food. Stop by the local food bank one day and take a look at who shows up. Talk to the person in charge about the types of people who get food there. Try opening your eyes to reality instead of the conservative talking points that would have you think everyone on food stamps and welfare is a lazy, government-mooching drug addict.

Dee Zee:

I don't believe any study that comes from the government. USDA in this case.


Was this supposed to be news?


wow what a shock h"have a joob eat good food" what a concept...
To those whom live in underperforming areas,there is a solution!

In Other News

Police & Fire

Two Face Multiple Charges After Traffic Stop In Fairfield


Former Westport Basketball Star Transferring To Duke

Police & Fire

White Van Spotted Near Wilton School, Police Say


Elizabeth T. Bok, 95, Lifelong Fairfield Resident


Katherine Michelin, 88, Retired From United Home Care In Fairfield


James J. Mead, 89, Of Fairfield